Did Roman legionaries wear Greaves?
Greaves, sheet metal protecting the legs, were widely used in the early republic, and by some troops in the imperial army. Early Roman legionaries would wear a single greave on the left leg which was more exposed under the shield, as it was fashion in Italic cultures.
Did Romans have Hoplite?
On the basis of Etruscan representations, it has been widely accepted that the main early Roman infantry type was an armoured hoplite. These hoplite would probably have worn bronze helmets, breastplate and greaves and a round leather or large circular bronze-plated wooden shield.
Who would win Vikings or Spartans?
Most people agree that Spartans would win any battle with the Vikings. Spartans would be victorious because of their superior war tactics and since-childhood training. The Spartans fought in the Phalanx formation, considered one of the most effective war tactics in history.
Why did Romans not wear leg armor?
The reason usually given is that their leadership duties made it difficult for them to carry and use a shield. Second, legionaries wearing greaves (or just one, on the left leg) may actually not have been that uncommon – it depended on the time and place of their operations.
Why did the Romans stop using the phalanx?
At the Battle of Cynocephalae in 197 BCE, the Romans defeated the Greek phalanx easily because the Greeks had failed to guard the flanks of their phalanx and, further, the Greek commanders could not turn the mass of men who comprised the phalanxes quickly enough to counter the strategies of the Roman army and, after …
Who would win Spartan or Viking?
Would a Viking beat a Samurai?
In terms of individual swordsmanship, the Samurai had elite skills. However, during their heyday, the Vikings, as a fighting force, vanquished Medieval Europe’s finest armies and settled many of their people on foreign soil. By the slimmest of margins, the edge goes to the Vikings over the Samurai.
Did Romans have muscle cuirass?
The monument of Aemilius Paulus at Delphi shows two Roman infantrymen wearing mail shirts alongside three who wear muscle cuirasses. They were worn mostly by officers, and may have been molded leather as well as metal, with fringed leather (Pteryges) at the armholes and lower edge.
What is the only weakness of the phalanx?
The main weakness of the phalanx alway was that its right wing was poorly protected, because hoplites had their shields on their left arm.
Could a Roman legion take down a Spartan hoplite?
Spartan hoplites though are quite different, they are out of the world insane hoplites. And could take any Roman with a sword out. Romes only way to wn would be complete encirclement on an open field, Legions are much more flexidle and if it is an open field Rome would take full advantage.
Are hoplites and legionaries meant to be different classes?
Luckily, since hoplites and legionaries are both classes of heavy infantry meant to fight others of their ilk, there should be no large deviation of tactics from how they’d normally fight. On to the proceedings…
Was the Spartan hoplon better than the Roman scutum?
The spartan hoplon was far more versatile than the Roman scutum. Anyone who has used both would generally agree with me. the number of blows a shield can deal is just as important as how much it can block (For when you lose your weapon as you inevitable will).
How many Spartan hoplites make up a phalanx?
Military service was the primary duty of Spartan men, and Spartan society was organized around its army. So 1,000 Spartan hoplites would form two battalions, which in battle would form two independent phalanxes.