What is the evidential form of the problem of evil?
The evidential problem of evil is the problem of determining whether and, if so, to what extent the existence of evil (or certain instances, kinds, quantities, or distributions of evil) constitutes evidence against the existence of God, that is to say, a being perfect in power, knowledge and goodness.
What is the problem of evil David Hume?
The problem of evil for theists was how to reconcile suffering with a benevolent God. Hume solved the problem of evil by claiming that the divine was amoral but not by denying God’s existence which he needed in order to advocate his favoured notion of a general providence.
What was David Hume’s main argument about the existence of God?
Finding God in an Orderly Universe Hume argues that an orderly universe does not necessarily prove the existence of God. Those who hold the opposing view claim that God is the creator of the universe and the source of the order and purpose we observe in it, which resemble the order and purpose we ourselves create.
What is the main difference between the evidential and logical problem of evil?
The logical problem of evil is deductive, and refers to the existence of evil in general. The evidential problem of evil is inductive (contains an inductive leap from the premises) and focuses on the extent and amount of evil – gratuitous evil. You just studied 24 terms!
What are the different types of evil?
There are two main types of evil:
- Moral evil – This covers the willful acts of human beings (such as murder, rape, etc.)
- Natural evil – This refers to natural disasters (such as famines, floods, etc.)
What is David Hume’s theory?
According to Hume’s theory of the mind, the passions (what we today would call emotions, feelings, and desires) are impressions rather than ideas (original, vivid and lively perceptions that are not copied from other perceptions).
What is the difference between the logical deductive problem of evil and the evidential inductive problem of evil?
What are the forms of evil?
According to Leibniz, there are three forms of evil in the world: moral, physical, and metaphysical.
Is the logical problem of evil inductive?
Author Information. The logical problem of evil and evidential argument from evil are deductive and inductive arguments respectively.
What is the evidential problem of evil?
The evidential problem of evil is the problem of determining whether and, if so, to what extent the existence of evil (or certain instances, kinds, quantities, or distributions of evil) constitutes evidence against the existence of God, that is to say, a being perfect in power, knowledge and goodness.
Can the argument from evil be formulated in terms of evils?
For not only can the argument from evil be formulated in terms of specific evils, but that is the natural way to do so, given that it is only certain types of evils that are generally viewed as raising a serious problem with respect to the rationality of belief in God.
Is there an inductive step in the evidential argument from evil?
Could the inductive step in the evidential argument from evil perhaps be of that form? One philosopher who has suggested that this is the case is William Rowe, in his 1991 article, “Ruminations about Evil”. Let us consider, then, whether that view can be sustained. In that article, Rowe formulates the premise of the crucial inference as follows:
Who discovered the problem of evil?
The best known presentation of the problem is attributed to the Greek philosopher Epicurus. It was popularized by David Hume . Besides the philosophy of religion, the problem of evil is also important to the fields of theology and ethics.