All of this literary style, a slight article, plan no is articulating his judgment on any point. The position makes sense to reinforce the common reasons and arguments.
Task and properties
The following properties are present for this direction. Small volume. Conditions have every chance of having a distinctive feature depending on the issue and problem. For example, the proposed maximum volume for students of Harvard business school is two sheets of handwritten text. The problem is always concrete. It does not have symbolic expressions, allegorical and vague reasoning, those that everyone is able to understand from his point of view. Thesis, the one that exhibited the problem, expressed clearly and unambiguously. The opening theme is based on only from him. The plot is invariably personal, because the main goal of the task is to formulate your judgment, to demonstrate your achievements. That is why the same question is usually disclosed by different people in completely different ways. That’s right. Sayings. Now this feature of the essay is almost always omitted. The lion’s share of linguists is convinced that the paradoxical expressions, striking provisions conflict, it would seem, ambivalent and, of course, illogical arguments are a mandatory part of the directions. Because this style should impress the reader. Easy to write thoughts. In contrast to the work of reflection or research paper is required to speak very plainly and clearly, to avoid difficult turns of speech and syntactic structures, clichés of words and phrases. The coherence of the narrative, the semantic unity of the article. Perhaps that is why today skipped paradoxical statements and provisions. After all, it is necessary to be a real expert of the word, to make two incompatible theses complementary. Conversational writing style. In addition, it is necessary to keep a balance so that the story is not too careless. Similarly, it is necessary to omit the use of slang, when this application does not require the content and motive necessarily.
How to write an essay: basic standards
The peculiarity of this direction is the absolute freedom of the concept of structure and utterance of ideas. Only one clear position – it is necessary to clearly Express their opinion according to the given topic, the one that is in the role title.
Most often, the appropriate structure of the essay: introduction, thesis-argument, conclusion.
The writer applies the necessary number of provisions to solve the problem. The author takes into account the necessary volume of texts. In addition, it is a valid but not mandatory structure. At all she can be and any. Conclusion is allowed to present in the form of a thesis at the beginning, well, in the text to prove it all. Or it is allowed to put forward an idea that is refuted in the course of the essay. In this case, the conclusion is the opposite of the initial thesis. Still permissible to submit a couple of abstracts and arguments, and then conclude. Another order of thought narration is also allowed.
Another note that in turn, usually the reader has a General idea of the subject of the essay. There is no need to disclose specific terms and explain difficult aspects. You simply speak on a given topic.
Content, examples, templates
There is no clear structure of the essay. A clear plan template is equally missing. For those who require content during the preparation of articles, it is allowed to resort to standard. The usual Plan contains a preamble, a main part and a conclusion. introduction, during which the main thesis is put forward. In the main part of the arguments put forward to confirm the main position. For example, I want to justify, in consequence of which the weakening of interest in the history of the metropolis is not good has an impact on the younger generation. It is important to ensure that there is no substitution of provisions. First, it is necessary to give arguments to prove what was discussed in the introduction. Only after that (if necessary) to put forward another thesis. If there is a desire or need, the following provisions are put forward by the same method with arguments emerging from the previous ones. The conclusion sums up absolutely everything reported (composed). The conclusion to which the writer came in the course of reflection. This point is necessary.